On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:52:55 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti > > On 12/15/17, Andy Bradford <[email protected]> wrote: > > As stated in the past, Fossil is meant for a tighter group of > > developers---perhaps this perception has changed---one in which > > impersonation is unlikely. > > > > I was very aware of all of these factors when I designed Fossil, 10 > years ago. Impersonation was a concern. But in a DVCS, there really > is no way around it. > > Defenses include: > > (1) The rcvfrom table that shows clearly where all artifacts > originated, thus allowing the originator of a deception to be tracked > down and dealt with administratively. > Maybe there should be a way to store this rcvfrom table in artifacts so the data is part of the permanent Fossil record. Maybe as control artifacts to auto-tag each each commit received via sync/pull/push?
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
