On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >>> tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. >>> >>> I had some tag in the original git repo, which was not branch, only a >>> tag to a particular version. Once I convert to fossil, those tag >>> propagate to future versions until next tag is reach. Those tags >>> seems to be like real branches after conversion to fossil. >>> >>> Did someone else get the same problem? Or I miss something? >> >> I've seen the same thing. >> >> Either I'm misunderstanding the git-fast-export file format documentation >> or else git-fast-export is getting branches and tags confused. > > git-fast-import works and generates the correct repository for the output of > git-fast-export. So there must be some way of interpreting the output of > git-fast-export correctly. Anybody with clues on how to do this, please > help! > > >> >> I'm not sure which it is, but I am leaning toward the problem being in >> git-fast-export. Others have reported issues with that tool, and the >> documentation for git-fast-export itself explains that it cannot >> successfully export the Linux kernel repository.... >> >> I've got some ideas on how I might work around the (presumed) brokenness >> in git-fast-export. If you are able to send me the output of >> git-fast-export from your repository, or let me clone you git repository, >> that will give me another example repository to work with. >> >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Martin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> fossil-users mailing list >>> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org >>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >> >> >> >> -- >> D. Richard Hipp >> d...@sqlite.org > > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
Maybe I am missing something here, but aren't tags simply identifiable by commits with revision prefix /refs/tags? Mark _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
