That would be helpful. I got the idea to use 'close' from section 4.4.4 of the fossil book, which indicates branches should be checked out by using 'open'. I thought to myself, "how could I open it if it is not first closed?", and thus my confusion was born.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Brian Cottingham <spiffyt...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Should fossil close/open behave differently from fossil update? Is this a >> bug in Fossil, or is it deliberate? >> >> >> > The behavior is deliberate. I'd understand what you are expecting from > close. > > My recommendation is that you never use the "close" command. It really is > not needed for anything. Maybe I should simply remove the "close" command > to avoid confusion? > > > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
