Out of curiosity, why are you converting from mercurial? I ask because my friends and I adopted fossil and other friends of ours are asking us why we didn't go with mercurial instead. I didn't really have a good answer, apart from "fossil seemed smaller (footprint, use-complexity) and cooler" =)
-jer On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 2011-07-18 à 09:17, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <virik...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > > Hello, > > > > As the lack of friendlyness I've always felt with git, before using > fossil I > > used mercurial. > > > > If I wanted to convert any mercurial repository to fossil, how should do > that? > > Has anyone done that? > > > > Regards, > > Lluís. > > Probably: hg --> git --> fossil > > Sorry, sent previous mail by mistake. > > -- > Martin > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
