+1
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Joerg Sonnenberger > Sent: 08/13/11 05:01 AM > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:42:23PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > > You know you can rename _FOSSIL_ as .fos, right? > > > > mv _FOSSIL_ .fos > > > > Should I make .fos the default? > > I think .fos is too random / short. .fossil would be fine as default on > UNIX (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as hidden on Windows, > that would be good too). > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
