On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Jacek Cała wrote: > A best practice question: > What is the preferred way to include external libraries in a fossil > repository? I mean larger dependencies like boost. > For small libs and tools like a few binary or source code files, I > tend to include them directly in the repo but for larger ones it > doesn't seem like a proper approach, esp. when the library code is > much larger than my sources.
Depends on the environment, but I'm kind of a fan of "it's scripted" approach. I remember a friend putting into our cmake some black magic that would download&build&install missing dependencies. I guess if your shop is homogenous this should not be that hard. Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
