On Jan 26, 2012, at 21:06 , Richard Hipp wrote: > The --interactive option is not really appropriate for the "commit" > command, for the reason cited above. But I can see an --interactive option > being useful for the "stash apply" command, so that you could selectively > pull parts of a stash into your working copy. I can also see it being > useful on "merge", especially when combined with --cherrypick. But not on > "commit"; the thought of adding --interactive to commit gives me shivers.
While I see nothing bad with partial commit (well, if partial commit is bad, why can we do it at file level?), doing it at stash does the trick and feels a bit more elegant. I'd vote for this option. Pozdrawiam, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
