Fully agree, the colored one suffers from being cluttered. If the
retro one grayed
the changed line to slightly highlight it, it would help a lot.

Shameless plug: Diff tool with built in Fossil support:
http://eskil.tcl.tk/index.html/doc/trunk/htdocs/fossil.wiki

/Peter

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Matt Welland <estifo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seconded. The hidden lines receive more emphasis than the change. Do a
> tkdiff on the same change and it is immediately obvious what the change is.
> I checked meld, tkdiff and xxdiff and in all of them the actual character
> that was removed is also highlighted making it immediately obvious what
> changed. It was not immediately obvious to me what changed in either the
> colored or retro examples. If fossil can't easily match the capability of an
> external tool then my vote would be to go with the retro.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Ramon Ribó <ram...@compassis.com> wrote:
>>
>> For me, much better with the colors. Maybe taking out the violet of the
>> hidden lines.
>> It helps a lot to focus the attention to the correct place.
>>
>> RR
>>
>> El 04/02/2012 13:24, "Richard Hipp" <d...@sqlite.org> escribió:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:08 AM, <altufa...@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Same here. I like the colorful diff.
>>>>
>>>> But I would like to know (sorry if I missed) what's the problem with
>>>> color sbs and what are we getting with retro sbs?
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is an example, two different websites showing the same Fossil
>>> project (TCL), one with the traditional colorful diff and the other with the
>>> new retro diff:
>>>
>>>   (1)  http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/ci/4ebc3a8e1e?sbs=1
>>>   (2)  http://mirror1.tcl.tk/tcl/ci/4ebc3a8e1e?sbs=1&dw=67
>>>
>>> The change of this check-in is a single line of code - indeed a single
>>> character on that one line.  With (1), my eyes are distracted by a bunch of
>>> needless coloration, and I have to stare at the screen for a second or two
>>> before I can discern what has actually changed.  I tried using colored diffs
>>> for a while, but I eventually gave up in frustration.  They are simply not
>>> useful to me.  I can read the old-style unified diffs faster. In (2), on the
>>> other hand, I can clearly and immediately see that one line has changed.
>>> The change "pops" out at me.  I don't have to think about it - it is just
>>> there.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Altu
>>>>
>>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>> > From: Weber, Martin S
>>>> > Sent: 02/03/12 11:03 PM
>>>> > To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
>>>> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs
>>>> >
>>>> > On 2012-02-03 12:31 , "Remigiusz Modrzejewski" <l...@maxnet.org.pl>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >I'm for color-coded. All of the reasons have already been listed in
>>>> > > the
>>>> > >thread.
>>>> >
>>>> > Same here.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Martin
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > fossil-users mailing list
>>>> > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>>>> > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> fossil-users mailing list
>>>> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> D. Richard Hipp
>>> d...@sqlite.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fossil-users mailing list
>>> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fossil-users mailing list
>> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to