> Sshfs didn't fix the problems that I was having with fossil+ssh, or at least > only did so partially.
Why not? In what sshfs failed to give you the equivalent functionality than a remote access to a fossil database through ssh? 2012/11/11 Timothy Beyer <bey...@fastmail.net> > At Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:31:57 +0100, > j. van den hoff wrote: > > > > thanks for responding. > > I managed to solve my problem in the meantime (see my previous mail in > > this thread), but I'll make a memo of sshfs and have a look at it. > > > > joerg > > > > Sshfs didn't fix the problems that I was having with fossil+ssh, or at > least only did so partially. Though, the problems that I was having with > ssh were different. > > What I'd recommend doing is tunneling http or https through ssh, and host > all of your fossil repositories on the host computer on your web server of > choice via cgi. I do that with lighttpd, and it works flawlessly. > > Tim > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
