Hello, It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names "rm" and "mv" were poorly chosen, because they have a Unix connotation, and "rename" and "move" has been suggested instead. So -- is there any reason we can't have both?
mv/rm - change to principle of least surprise move/remove - behaves like current mv/rm That way we all get what we want .. no? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
