On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:11:49 -0600 Carson Chittom <car...@wistly.net> wrote:
> Yes, basically, it's the "probably should save for later" need--mostly > for legal reasons. Currently all this is in hardcopy, as I mentioned, > the volume of which has reached such a level as to be simply > impenetrable; part of the reason for putting them as images into a > repository is simply to organize them. Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a very large binary file set. That sort of thing quickly gets up larger than most photo collections. The logic of the concept is sound. Report back on how it goes in practice. -- C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
