On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:51:05AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some modifications to the
> fossil SSH URL handling. I'm at a point where I could use some feedback
> regarding the previous method for handling SSH.
>
[snip]
I like the idea to have new ssh implementation that don't depend on
shell and to have capability to use ssh protocol without using accounts
with shell access. But I think there's still have some work and test
that need to be done on this implementation.
I tried your patch, I don't know if I'm missing something but it
doesn't work for me... I made a simple test in the same way I was using
ssh:// protocol before, without using SSH keys restrictions and I got
following results:
1- Some new line are missing when asking for password, so I'm
typing password over the first line of sync status output.
(I guess this is not a problem when using ssh keys
but output should still be correct when using
password)
2- Clone return with no warning or error right away with 0
artifact sent and 0 artifact received and I end up with a
empty fossil file and a fossil-journal file..
(On OpenBSD 5.3 amd64)
Exact same command with non-patched fossil work.
--
Martin G.
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
