Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:11:52 +0100: > <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/2015bbd55d> > > Still no objections, anyone? I think it's ready to be integrated into > trunk (using "merge --integrate", of course), but another round of > evaluation never hurts!
It might be a little late in the game, but why is it called integrate? Maybe I missed the discussion about why it is called that---I'll scour the archives. Something like --closeleaf would seem to be more representative of what it does. I tested it out and it worked. I even was able to close trunk with it by doing: fossil update branch fossil merge --integrate trunk Getting a new trunk was also kind of interesting. I'm not suggesting that this be prevented, by the way, because it's already possible to close the ``trunk'' leaf. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000051f9ca02 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
