On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, David Given <d...@cowlark.com> wrote:
> On 21/12/13 00:05, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Every repository as an initial check-in which is empty. But it always > has > > a different SHA1 hash, since it also includes the timestamp from when the > > repository was created. > > Is it guaranteed that this will only ever be only checkin with no > parents? No such guarantee. Though you will have to do some unsavory things to your repository to get it into a state where this is not true. > And that all other checkins will have this as an ultimate > ancestor? If so, thanks, it's just what I'm looking for. > > (It'd be nice if it were tagged so it could be found via a symbolic name > --- although I suspect that I'm the only person who's asked for this...) > > -- > ┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── > │ "There does not now, nor will there ever, exist a programming > │ language in which it is the least bit hard to write bad programs." --- > │ Flon's Axiom > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
