On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Ramon Ribó <ram...@compassis.com> wrote:
> > > > The current Fossil implementation runs a separate process for each HTTP > > request. So an in-memory cache wouldn't be helpful. It has to be disk- > > based. > > Does not FastCGI do exactly the opposite? > > Fossil doesn't support FastCGI, only SCGI. And even with SCGI, Fossil forks a new process to handle each request. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
