On 3/9/15, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Perhaps if there were > 15--20 rails, where they were taking up a disproportionate amount of > space (2) might make a big enough difference. >
Oh, it does. Try a graph with "n=all" and you'll see. When you start to get a lot of rails, and the graph gets all scrunched together, then (2) is clearly better. The question is should we go with (2) always, or use (1) for graphs that have more space and save (2) for scrunched up graphs. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
