On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > Other proposed changes include more frequent nagging about forks. The > issue is less clear-cut, but I still worry that it might contribute to > warning fatigue.
I think the most reasonable approach is to mirror Mercurial. Before a pull/sync operation, remembering the number of leaves per branch. Compare this to the number of leaves per branch afterwards and report changes. If you skip new/closed branches, it would result in something like: +1 leaf for trunk -1 leaf for hot-development Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
