On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:40:04PM -0700, bch wrote: > Ugh. Again, include fossil-users@
Right, that's the situation I meant. fossil should be retrying with the next set of missing changes and not stop when it can no longer make progress on the current set. Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
