On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:12:25PM +0200, David Given wrote: > There ought to be a cleverer way to do this than just relying on the > timestamp (which can be wrong). Isn't there an SQL example which uses a > recursive query to walk the commit tree? That way we'd be guaranteed to > get a correct order.
Sure, but those ways are significantly more expensive :( Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
