On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Dömötör Gulyás <dognot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heh, we DID use to have a separate network, where we could pretty much do > what we wanted, with a linux server, but it was disbanded a while ago. To > save money or somesuch nonsense. > long term, sharing a fossil repo on an SMB share is likely to cost more, in terms of lost work when the repo gets corrupted. It is only a matter of time before it happens. > And unfortunately not all devs sit in the same building. Anyway, I'll just > upload a repo, probably most people will just read it, and when changes are > to be made, it'll be on me to manage merging anyway. This really isn't a > software company :/ > You have been warned. Why not host the repo on an external site via CGI? A hoster capable of this costs $5/month, and anyone with internet access will be able to reach it (provided they know where it is). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
