Here's what I see on my *local* machine (see also attached ffox screenshot):
strathcona$ fossil timel === 2016-01-05 === 10:12:56 [d4dc7ad8dc] [c541b6e734] Remove unintended white space change in wiki.c (user: dave.vines) 08:40:09 [64a5ef28e5] [c541b6e734] Move attachment command from wiki.c to attach.c (user: dave.vines) 08:34:24 [16f864af8f] [c541b6e734] Move attachment from wiki subcommand to top level command (user: dave.vines) 04:52:59 [cd58f59a47] Update the built-in SQLite to the next 3.10.0 beta. (user: drh tags: trunk) === 2016-01-04 === 23:29:36 [c3430c1a67] Edit [2c5a5e82be8c30d7|2c5a5e82be]: Edit check-in comment. (user: aku) 03:41:15 [6f8f8667c9] Update manifests on tag change. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 03:10:27 [53f2e7c540] Filter tags. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 02:54:39 [dacecc79aa] Handle the three manifest files separately so manifest generation reconfigurations can be handled properly. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 02:16:47 [46b9adb70f] Conditionally save manifests on commit. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 00:36:40 [de30eec201] Code normalization; tabs->spaces. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 00:29:24 [c6f3eba715] Edit [e5b250959ad4ec15|e5b250959a]: Edit check-in comment. (user: jan) 00:28:40 [aed6fe5308] Add manifest.tags to generated zips, and decouple manifest and manifest.uuid. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 00:22:03 [185669ce21] Fix: Extract filename for manifest.tags. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 00:19:00 [6a56db89f6] Added a missing finalize. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) === 2016-01-03 === 23:55:15 [80ceedbdea] Add manifest.tags to tarballs when appropriate, and decouple manifest and manifest.uuid. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 22:54:15 [142cb7aabd] Add manifest.tags to the list of potentially reserved names and decouple manifest and manifest.uuid from each other. (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) 22:46:00 [226e7c2842] Fix; second argument of db_get_versioned() is not that of db_get(). (user: jan tags: jan-manifest-tags) --- line limit (20) reached --- On 1/5/16, bch <brad.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dave. > > Don't fret! I'm not attributing this to malice or blaming -you-, but > something does look strange to me (on my local copy of the repo). > > Cheers, > > -bch > > On 1/5/16, David Vines <d...@zombi.eclipse.co.uk> wrote: >> On 05/01/2016 18:53, bch wrote: >>> How did we end up w/ dave.vines' completely untagged (no branch) >>> commits in the repository (or am I misreading what these are?) ? >>> >>> ref: >>> /info/b208bf75777604dc >>> /timeline?u=dave.vines&c=2016-01-05+10%3A12%3A56&nd&n=200 >> >> If I've messed this up, I do most humbly apologise and want to fix it >> ASAP - but I see this as tagged as "technoteattachcli", at least in the >> fossil-scm.org web ui. >> >> One curious aspect I do see is that the web ui has the annotation of >> "unpublished" against the creation of the branch. I did start by have a >> private branch which I then published - I do wonder if this might be >> part of the problem. >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> fossil-users mailing list >> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org >> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >> >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
