On 25 April 2016 05:33PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> @michael: I have been using `fsl' myself happily for several years now. I
> also have tried a couple of times to draw attention to its existence on
> this list (getting the same feedback -- i.e.: none -- as you). but I am
> sure you are mistaken in your interpretation why this happens. why should
> anybody be hostile to you (or the tool)? I'm sure the lack of feedback has
> a much more profane reason: most people just don't care for any wrapper
> around fossil's CLI (or have their own) but are waiting for native support
> of the asked-for functionality or are much more interested in the web GUI.

...because the web UI already provides the functionality they're looking for.

> @everybody: `fsl' indeed seems massively under-appreciated. it is very
> helpful and improves CLI interaction with fossil substantially in my
> experience (notably the branch where I have further adjusted everything to
> my own liking ("dresden") ;-)). colorized diff and timeline output and the
> alias facility alone are worth it (personally I wanted chronological
> "symbolic" checkin enumeration a la `hg' as well and got it in the
> above-mentioned branch ...).

Anything that extends Fossil's current capabilities, even if it's mostly on the
UI side, probably warrants a special mention on the Fossil website, I think. :)

----
Thank you,
Arnel
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to