HI Clark,
On 9 June 2016 at 11:23, Clark Christensen <cdcmi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Is there a good reason you can’t at least upgrade to the latest point
>> release, 1.34?
>
> Valid point.  I'm not sure what "the latest" offers that I can't live
> without.  Plus, there's been a lot of discussion here about the behavior of
> 'mv' and 'rm'.  Some want Fossil to modify the filesystem by default.  I do
> not.  I can't remember what the outcome is WRT to Fossil's behavior here.
> So I'm lazy about adopting 'the latest' without spending the time to
> understand what changed.  Especially when what I have continues to work
> reliably.

1.35 is now released and you should use it:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html

Updating software isn't necessarily always about things you can't live
without, but also bug fixes to both fossil and sqlite3. Since fossil
1.32 was released (2015-03-14), I count 19 sqlite3 releases:
http://sqlite.org/changes.html





-- 
-------
inum: 883510009027723
sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info
xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to