> > > Fossil *could* be modified to self-repair. It has the info it needs to do > so. > > But then, why bother in a world where you have things like ZFS, which can > protect not only your Fossil repos, but also everything else you hold dear? >
So say the's an old version of a PNG that's corrupt in replica-a. It is four versions back from tip/head by that's academic, In replica-b it is OK. There's three commits/pushes a minute to both replica-a (and b by implication) which are now at 6GB in size, because this is a busy hypothetical team. So somehow Btrfs or ZFS know Fossil well enough to repair a small section of a moving target? - Paul
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
