On 8/13/16, Kain Abel <isoru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > after > $ fossil stash pop > or > $ fossil stash rm > is the pointer for the next stash id (stash-next in table vvar) untouched.
And thus each new stash has a unique id. Is that a problem? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
