On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: >> Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a >> lot, but then make sure you are on the filesystem like ZFS/btrfs which >> does that for you transparently and you do not need to do that on the >> fossil side. > > Eh, no. You do not need a file system with automatic hashing. Every > single file is still recorded by checksum in Fossil. It is not what the > repo checksum option does.
Errhmm, thanks for correction. Am I right that repo checksum switched on means that modified files will be those where checksum stored and checksum computed from the file on fs is different? And once you switch that off, you rely purely on comparison of modification time on file in fs and I guess stored modif time in repo db? If so, then indeed I've been completely mistaken and thank you very much for your kind correction. If however I'm still off, I would appreciate reference to some material explaining repo/chksums business in fossil. Thanks! Karel _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
