Hi, I'd like to object the default use of low-contrast type in professional software :)
I use displays that are adjusted for low eye strain by reducing contrast and brightness. Having type and typography do the same thing again has the opposite effect and legibility starts to suffer. Regards, Stanislav Stanislav Paskalev On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > Which is better? > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > Also: > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/finfo?name=src/search.c > > Surf about from any of the links above for additional views. > > The change here is to emphasis the check-in comment and de-emphasize > the links to the check-in details and other information. > > In the recent HN discussion of Fossil > (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15752725) some comments were > sharply critical of the timeline display in Fossil. While I think > those comments were overly dramatic, they did bring up the point that > the check-in comment is probably the most important feature and should > be more prominent. This A/B comparison is my attempt to make them so. > > Further suggestions and/or comments are welcomed. > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
