Anthony wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com > >> wrote: >> > > >> Frankly, as a person who thinks nothing of enjoying a sauna >> with members of the other gender of any age, I think you are >> overstating it considerably to say *all* of us think the image is >> even mildly controversial, except for the perverted sense of >> shame many cultures have bestowed on the natural human >> body form. >> >> > > Give me a break. You don't have to have a perverted sense of shame about > the natural human body form to take a stand against the sexual exploitation > of young child for the purposes of selling a heavy metal album. >
Wow, how involved can you make a logical statement. Would I break your rebuttal of my stement, I would say that you can only exploit that which is exceptional and rarified in the market. If you can see nekkid pre- and postpubescent girls as a matter of course at a sauna, there is no ability to exploit it at all. > There are many photographs of nudity on Wikipedia. Only *one* of them > caused this controversy, and the one that caused it was *not* chosen > randomly. Well, if it wasn't chosen randomly, I just will say the ones choosing need to look at where their testicles and brain pan is, not necessarily in that order. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l