2009/1/22 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org> wrote:
>> As Thomas said, it requires Internet access, which might not be available. >> I think it's a bit more than that, though. The credit should be part of the >> work itself, not external to the work. When you're talking about a website, >> it's hard to define where the work begins and where it ends, clearly a work >> can span multiple URLs, and it's essentially meaningless whether or not >> those URLs have different domain names (at least assuming they are both kept >> nearly 100% reliable). None of these three things are true with books, >> T-shirts, or movies (for a movie a URL would be especially obnoxious). > As a contributor to these 'ere projects myself, I personally would > prefer the less reliable but more informative URL for attribution > myself. That's a personal preference only, and I don't see any need to > push that on others. Use my stuff, that's why I write it! I dual-licensed all my article space text and pictures as CC-by-sa any a while ago anyway. More people should do this IMO. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l