2009/3/4 KillerChihuahua <pu...@killerchihuahua.com>: > I cannot stress enough how strongly I agree with this assessment. If > NPOV, V, and RS were followed - as they should be by normally > intelligent adults wishing to write good articles - BLP isn't even > needed at all. I support BLP existing, although I've seen it misused a > good bit - but IMO it wouldn't hurt a bit if someone IAR'd and gutted a > lot of the other policies that have grown up like weeds over the last > couple of years. More will only make matters worse.
Not quite - the important difference with BLPs is that we cannot be eventualist (start with an awful article and let it improve with time) - we do not have the luxury of eventualism. With BLPs, we must be immediatist - we must not have a live version that violates the content rules. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l