2009/3/16 Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:59 AM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Indeed. The claim is meaningless and querulous noise. Printed objects >> commonly have a URL on them these days. Listing a source or history >> short URL would do the job it's intended to. > True, but those are not URLs that contain information that they are > contractually obliged to provide to you together with the object. You have failed to establish how that makes any difference - it doesn't. The reason for it being there makes no difference as to whether people know what a URL is when they see it in print. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
