Yeah. I don't remember exactly what Ting said, and even if I did, I wouldn't comment on it. But FWIW to your point, Ting's not in a chapters-selected seat; Ting was elected by the Wikimedia community.
------Original Message------ From: David Gerard To: Sue Gardner GMail To: email@example.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening Sent: 9 May 2010 4:21 PM On 10 May 2010 00:04, Sue Gardner <susanpgard...@gmail.com> wrote: > My view is that Jimmy and others have brought closure to the "scope of > Jimmy's authority" question. In saying that, I don't mean to diminish the > importance of that question -- I realize that many people are angry about > what's happened over the past week, and it will take time for them to be less > angry. Ting's statements on the role of the Board (that it should regulate project content) will also take some digesting. I doubt chapters outside the US put people forward for the Board thinking this would mean the Board supporting content removal to appease Fox News. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l