On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > A lot of the projects that Wikimedia is investing in today are small and > focused on particular needs of the Wikimedia Foundation, not the Wikimedia > community. One example might be an article feedback tool that's largely > focused on ensuring that Wikimedia fulfills its Public Policy grant > requirements rather than actually being a useful tool for rating and > evaluating articles. (Imagine if you could find the most fascinating > articles, similar to ted.com's system; now look at what Wikimedia has > implemented.)
*cough* From 2005: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/1.0 Magnus put together a quick version, but Brion didn't like the code and it never happened. However, mine is just one such proposal. Article rating has been a wanted feature for *years*. What I'd like to see is article rating being more widespread. But having a grant push it through is *just fine*, because it gets it done at all. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l