On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 16:01, Gil Forcada <gforc...@gnome.org> wrote: > El dt 10 de 08 de 2010 a les 09:43 -0400, en/na Jose Aliste va escriure: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Johannes Schmid <j...@jsschmid.de> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> >> So to stress things, the site should clearly state that the plugins >> >> are property of their developers and that problems should go to them >> >> (as the addons.mozilla.org does) Of course we could also showcase >> >> GNOME-"blessed" plugins with some logo of Gnome. For me "blessed"w >> >> would mean are to be defined as maintained in a repository in the >> >> gnome git server. >> > >> > Wouldn't it be better to restrict us to high quality plugins in the first >> > place? So, basically, getting accepted on addons.gnome.org would mean to >> > deliver quality code, translation and documentation. >> > >> > We could have some kind of "staging" area of course but I would want this >> > area to be disabled by default, with a clear "You have been warned"-sign >> > attached to it. >> I totally agree with you. However, who would be responsible to review >> a plugin outside the staging area? > > Let's first focus on what we need to create a first prototype version of > it, link somehow with libpeas [1] and then we can start adding staging > areas and flowers and rainbows.
Actually, AMO already has a staging area as described by Jose, they call it sandbox. You can read more about it here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/policies Regards, Tomeu > I mean, obviously that there are lot of things to work out, but it would > get more interest from developers and users if there's something to play > with. > > For example we can start allowing only themes (for gnome-appearance > capplet and gedit color styles) and backgrounds (again for > gnome-appearance capplet). > > Then after this works successfully we can add snippets for Anjuta, > plugins for EOG, GNOME Shell and gedit and so on. > > My 5 cents, > > Cheers, > > [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/libpeas > >> > >> > Remember that we aren't a company that needs to promote its appstore by >> > having lots of stuff there and we can concentrate on quality. See [1] >> > related to that. >> This was never in my mind ;) I am not an apple fan :). I am a Gnome fan. >> >> Greetings >> >> José >> >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > Johannes >> > >> > [1] http://www.mobileuserexperience.com/?p=896 >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-list mailing list >> foundation-list@gnome.org >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list > > -- > gil forcada > > [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer > [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network > bloc: http://gil.badall.net > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > foundation-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list > _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list