> GSoC is also outside of the mission statement
Why do you mention that? GSoC is organized by Google, not by GNOME. I think the discussion should focus on what is relevant I agree, but as I just said the subject of the thread is "GNOME's mission statement", not "financial and administrative aspects of the OPW program". On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM, meg ford <meg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Mathieu Duponchelle < > mduponchel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It seems I'm far from being the only one to think OPW should be >> abstracted away from GNOME. The subject of this thread clearly is GNOME's >> mission statement, and I'm interested in further discussion / opinions on >> that subject. >> > > I don't think it's relevant. GSoC is also outside of the mission > statement, though as I said before I think there are allusions to outreach > in the Charter. I think the discussion should focus on what is relevant, > which is how the Foundation should deal with the financial and > administrative aspects of the program. Otherwise we can also lump in any > other outreach we do to new contributors, which I think would be odd, since > FOSS does rely on contributors and internship programs are a good way to > recruit them. > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-list mailing list >> foundation-list@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list >> >> >
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
