What about worldofgnome.org?

Is not a matter to get it down with a demand. GNOME Foundation have better
things to invest to, but what about to work with it/he/she in order to
change ideas and the way they are exposed, making then informed and good
supported?

Having 8k followers and blaming is negative to the project. While some
issues pointed are partially true, some of them are no supported by good
sources or investigation.

Is better to act with care and work around.
El may. 16, 2016 9:28 AM, "Dave Neary" <nea...@gmail.com> escribió:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 05/16/2016 09:41 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> > How to avoid any organization or individual, could use GNOME trademark
> > to promote against GNOME?
>
> You cannot use trademark to stop someone from calling a thing by its
> trademarked name.
>
> For example, Mars cannot stop me from calling a Snickers a Snickers.
> They can stop me calling a different peanut, nougat, caramel and
> chocolate bar a Snickers.
>
> > Is the case of World of GNOME (WOGUE on G+). It recently has pushed
> > blaming, unsupported complaints (no data about his source is based on
> > real data from projects maintainers).
>
> Is the Wogue account talking about GNOME when they call it GNOME? If so,
> there is nothing you can do using trademark.
>
> In terms of things which are not GNOME, you can use the GNOME trademark
> if your usage is consistent with the GNOME trademark guidelines. (say,
> calling a website gnome-sucks.org might be a trademark infringement,
> since the gnome-sucks website is not GNOME, or consistent with the GNOME
> trademark guidelines).
>
> There are other forms of legal recourse, but I do not think it is
> appropriate to use them to stop people saying negative things about you,
> unless those things are:
>
> 1. Clearly and provably factually inaccurate
> 2. Actively harming the reputation and good standing of the project
> (say, if they are getting a lot of exposure)
> 3. Clearly not satire, humour, parody.
>
> In this case, you could try a defamation/libel case, but to what end?
>
> > While I'm not against he can publish his complaints on GNOME, I think he
> > can't use GNOME trademark to push negative, or few news to try to
> > support its negative ideas about GNOME.
> >
> > Sure, feedback is good, but while he is not part of GNOME Foundation, I
> > think, may he is unable to use GNOME trademark to blame and no positive
> > actions to help.
>
> I think this is a misunderstanding of trademark rules. And regardless of
> whether you *could* do this, I do not think that you *should*.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Neary - Boston, MA
> @nearyd / http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh
> Ph: +1-978-486-0168 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Reply via email to