Hi, On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Allan Day <a...@gnome.org> wrote: > because Ben's behaviour had become so unacceptable (despite multiple > warnings regarding basic behaviour) that it was difficult to get > anything done within the wider working group context.
And on Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:45 AM, he added: > It should be noted that the board group includes every active member > of the code of conduct working group, with the exception of Ben. So > "without including the rest of the WG" translates to "without > including Ben". The WG is a group working on a document that invites people involved in a conflict to seek assistance from a third party. Yet it seems that, when a conflict arised, they didn’t call for external arbitration, and even went as far as issuing warnings to one of the parties involved on their own. I find this highly disturbing. He then concludes: > As already stated, this was a direct response to > repeated unacceptable behaviour on Ben's part. Whether that was the appropriate behaviour is still an open question though. Cheers, -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
