On 01 Aug 2005, at 22:11, Gerhard Scholz wrote:
I found out that for operators which are declared to be inline and
have asm code
inside the inlining option is ignored (I assume the same would be
true for
procs/funcs).
Is that intentional? Does it have a reason?
Yes, inlining assembler is much harder than inlining Pascal code (and
even harder to do it efficiently).
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
