> So, may I conclude that FPC is targetting D7 language compatibility? That's > sound fair enough to me, and -thanks God- I can live with that. :)
Roughly yes. That is the goal of the 2.0.x branch, languagewise. > Is the D7 compatibility has been reached fully or partially or still under > development? How far the compatibility of FPC v.2.0 with D7? Is there any > docs explain about this issue? Because I still failed to compile my D7 > codes under FPC 2.0. _language_ compability. Some known missing functionality: 1 implements style delegation 2 vararray support is patchy. 3 customvariants are missing in the rtl 4 packages 5 dispinterfaces and dispid. 6 assembler routines have some constructs that are not supported. These are being eliminated at a fairly decent rate the last few months Libraries are done on a case by case basis (is this part already legacy in D6/D7, is it too OS specific etc). _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel