* Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sat, 22 Dec 2007
00:43:37 +0100 (CET)]:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Andrey Gusev wrote:
> That strange, developers team do nothing without ready sample.
> See http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=10457
First of all, it is not correct that they 'do nothing'.
I have regarded the #16839 raply and switching state to "information" as
direct refusal to do something at all.
I wasn't right ?
Fixing a bug for which there is no test code is very hard.
There are 280.000 lines of code in the compiler.
I also now have under lazarus/fpc ~100000 lines of my sources (on me
one),
so question in that, for whom is more harder to investigate YOUR errors
?
Apparently, i must accept as my duty only differential diagnostic
between your and my code.
I think, on stage of publishing (cutted) DM1.pas in #10457 report my
duties was ended.
The rest has been done only from my LOVE to fpc and lazarus (that error
was not critical to my projects).
I expected more activity from developers team in serious errors
investigation.
With simple and straightforward code, the bug is not reproducible.
I have tried this.
So, yes, you must provide an example so the bug can be located
within a more reasonable amount of time.
DM1.pas part published have all required to error localization.
{$mode delphi} significance clarification has taken away ~20 minutes of
time.
But that even not was tried, it may be guilty New Year's holidays ?
There is nothing wrong with asking that, I think ?
Nothing, but I have regarded it as the requirement.
I do not try at all start squabble, i'm possible is simply tired.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
