In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: > > theoretically be instantiated. On the other hand, I read that recently > > the LCL was restructured a bit to improve the situation, so maybe the > > results would be better now. > > > > Also note that WPO can do little about published methods (since it must > > assume that these can all be called via RTTI). > > Maybe the IDE can feedback some info about used classes and methods?
In time, a pascal analyser would be a good thing to have. I think analysis of smartlinking is more something for an analyzer than the compiler itself (though the compiler could generate certain datafiles obviously). I was thinking about such things due to the recompilation bug, searching for a way to get _easily_ insight into the uses struccture. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
