On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Juha Manninen wrote:

On keskiviikko, 6. tammikuuta 2010 12:42:23 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Still, best solution has been to put everything into one big file. And
still, I don't like that compiler forces such a thing.

The compiler forces you many other things. Still, I don't get what's the
problem with a large unit if it's really needed (and nothing like
abstract base classes or interfaces or type casts or ... helps). Stuff
closely depending on each other should end in the same unit. You even
cannot test a unit with external circular class references without the
other involved units. So why should the stuff be separated?

I must admit this is a good point. This is more of a cultural issue between
programming languages.
If the tool chain supports big source files and if people accept them, there
is no problem.
<OOT> I hope Lazarus can soon edit parts of one file in many editor tabs.
</OOT>

Other programming languages have different cultures. See the comment from my
original post in this thread. It was from a professional programmer and I
understand it. Some development teams want to put every class into its own
file. C and C++ even have headers in separate files (which is messy IMO).

So, if a professional team chooses a programming language / environment for a
project, this one feature can make a strong point against Object Pascal.

Why ? Every class in 1 file is perfectly possible with include files, and 1 big unit file.

If someone comes from C this should not be a problem, since every C file
simply is an include file, header file or not. There are no "privileged
files". In pascal there are: the unit and the program. The unit is called
'unit' because it 'unites' a set of routines that are closely interrelated.

Honestly, I don't understand what the fuss is all about. You can make it
as complicated or as simple as you want, it is all up to you.

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to