On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:53 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > > So as long as this problem isn't fixed in fpcmake, we can't use fpmake > > for packages which are installed using fpcmake. Iow: we can't make > > package which have dependencies on any package which comes with Free > > Pascal. (As long as we don't switch to fpmake entirely) > > > > So in principle your statement is right: fixing this will lead to a > > (long) period that both systems can be used at the same time. But I > > doubt that forcing a transition at once, will lead to a faster > > acceptance of fpmake. ;) > > If handled right, I don't see why not. > I doubt many users are aware of the Package.fpc and fpcmake.
Yeah, well, on second thought. Maybe you're right. See what happens if I change the makefile from one package... > But since you'll be doing the work, who am I to complain ? :-) Well, in this case you would have to help me fixing fpcmake. But I'll try to go for the big bang. Joost. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel