On 22 Oct 2010, at 15:09, Martin wrote: > On 22/10/2010 12:28, Jonas Maebe wrote: >> >>> AFAIK "constref" was invented for passing values to external subroutines, >>> that expect a reference. In how far does "constref" affect the *caller*, in >>> contrast to e.g. "var"? Can constref pass properties, which are not allowed >>> as var parameters? >> >> >> Right now it's allowed (if the property uses a getter, the getter is called >> and its result is put into a temp location whose address is passed), but I >> think that's a bug in the implementation. > > Why?
Because it's not possible to pass a reference to a property. Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
