Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
<markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
But if you're considering making it public wouldn't it be better to use the
"official" 2.4.2 release, at least until somebody really had to have a
recent fix or extension?
I think too that it should be made official. It will also be better
when people can use 2.4.2 + this particular patch then if people need
to test snapshots which change all the time.
I had to go briefly onto 2.5.1 for ARM and found
that it refused to compile Lazarus- if I recall correctly there was a
conditional in the source where anything that wasn't 2.4 was assumed to be
2.2 or older.
You should try again, the latest Lazarus source code should compile
with fpc 2.5.1
I will, but since I'm running natively on a system with very limited
memory running a complete build takes a week.
Lazbuild using 2.4.2 on armel generates working programs.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
