In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:55 AM, LacaK <la...@zoznam.sk> wrote: > > So if this constant can not be changed, then I must write workaround for > > date '01/01/0001' and do not add time part to this date. > > The constant was already changed once, and no-one complained in the > following years, so my guess is that it could be changed again or even > eliminated. > > See: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg07984.html
I think sacrificing dates from the year 1 to 100 AD to keep old two digit databases working is a small price to pay. If the test doesn't take this into account, the test is simply wrong. Maybe the difference between "datetime" and "time" or "datetime-difference" must be strengthened. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
