On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Martin Schreiber <mse00...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02.05.2012 15:41, Marcos Douglas wrote: >> >>> This last one is bad advice, this code will break as soon as they switch to >>> 2.6.3. Which, presumably, eventually they will. >>> >>> If you really want to avoid the messages, it is better to use TBookmark, >>> GetBookmarkData and FreeBookmark. >>> That will not generate warnings and will continue to work with 2.6.3. >> Well, that was the way I chose. >> > Please don't forget to call FreeBookmark() in a try ... finally block > otherwise there will be memory leaks in case of exceptions.
Yes, I do this always. This is not the best way, I agree, but works. >>> Or you can simply ignore the warnings, which is by far the easiest option. >>> I can't believe people are making such fuss over a couple of warnings. >>> >>> Michael. >> The problem, for me, would be break the sources in production. >> If GetBookmarkData and FreeBookmark will continue work so, that is >> what I will use. >> > You could define a "bookmarkty" alias yourself if Lazarus does not > provide it. This is one idea, yes. But I will wait the finish of this history and what will be decided. Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
