On 11/23/2014 12:04, John Marino wrote: > Hello, > I've applied the DragonFly BSD support to the trunk. The 2.6.4 compiler > can bootstrap it and it builds itself and helloworld. > > I've split it into 3 patch sets for the convenience of the committer: > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/df-fpc/dfly-support-existing-most.diff > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/df-fpc/dfly-support-existing-packages.diff > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/df-fpc/dfly-support-rtl-dragonfly.diff > > The first diff are modifications to existing files minus anything in > packages. The second diff are modifications to existing files in > packages. The third diff is the entire rtl/dragonfly directory minus a > makefile. > > After committing, > 1) all makefile needs need regenerated (and rtl/dragonfly/Makefile > generated) > 2) utils/fpcm/fpcmake.inc needs to be regenerated > > Notes: > A) The change to compiler/cfileutl.pas is not intended to be > permanent, but until I figure out why dircache isn't working, it's needed. > B) (ignore) > C) rtl/bsd/ostypes: changed S_IFMT and friends to octal. They were > correct but octal is a lot easier to check than decimal -- headers are > written in octal. > > > I would be very elated if this could get committed prior to the next > release as Free Pascal 2.6.4 is already available to via a derivative of > the FreeBSD Ports Collection (called DPorts) > > Thanks to all who provided advise to get me here. > Regards, > John
I am wondering what the next step is. Are these patch sets currently under review? Is anything more needed from me? thanks, John _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
