On 07.12.2016 11:31, Maciej Izak wrote: > Okay then, maybe I'll manage that this week (no promise though ;) ). > I personally think that removing TRttiContext for now is the better > choice, so people will know not to use it while they might expect valid > values in the other case... > > > I am waiting :P. Sure, feel free to remove TRttiContext. IMO almost > empty TRttiContext has not many sense yet.
So, the unit is committed. If you extend it, please also extend the FPCUnit test in $fpcdir/packages/rtl-objpas/tests/tests.rtti.pas. You can compile it like this after a "make all" at the toplevel: ./compiler/ppcx64 -n -Furtl/units/x86_64-linux -viwn -FEwhatever -Fupackages/fcl-fpcunit/units/x86_64-linux -Fupackages/rtl-objpas/units/x86_64-linux -Fupackages/fcl-base/units/x86_64-linux ./packages/rtl-objpas/tests/testrunner.rtlobjpas.pp And then you simply execute the resulting testrunner.rtlobjpas binary. It will print its results on StdOut. Also when you have extended the unit and provide your changes: please use baby steps, not one big patch to rule them all ;) Regards, Sven _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
