On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
With your extended "forward type resolution" this would no longer be possible.
Theoretically it probably can, but multiple passes would be needed.
This would aversely affect the compiler speed.
Note that the example shows consecutive type blocks. They can be merged
simply by ignoring a TYPE while already in a type block.
That was the gist of my proposal to do "type section folding".
This saves some trouble cause by header generators.
And hence my proposal to improve the header generators...
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
